- Home
- Check a company
- Platform checks
- BG Wealth Sharing / DSJ Exchange (DSJEX)
BG Wealth Sharing and DSJEX: blocked withdrawals and the SEC case
Known domains/brands: dsjex.net, bg877.com, bg661.com, dsj89.com, dsjex123.com
Event date:
Published · 3 min read
The Proofmark · Our methodology
Verified by the Proofmark team · how we verify
Checked by The Proofmark editorial team against our methodology before publishing
Want to explore the details? Choose your question
5 sections
Why BG Wealth and DSJEX appear in the same case
The SEC describes two parts of one alleged arrangement: BG Wealth Sharing promoted trading signals, while DSJ Exchange, also called DSJEX, provided the account into which customers deposited crypto and copied those signals. The connection comes from the regulator’s complaint, not simply similar names or website design.
Filed on 29 October 2026 in the Northern District of California, case 3:26-cv-12746 concerns more than $130 million raised. The SEC alleges losses exceeding $100 million. Those figures describe the alleged scheme overall, not a sum available for distribution to customers.
What did the “AI trading” promise actually involve?
According to the complaint, BG Wealth claimed customers could earn at least 60% a month, double their principal in 40 days and trade without risk. Customers entered signal codes into the DSJ account and saw rising balances.
The SEC alleges the displayed trades and profits were fictitious. It says most investor assets were diverted, with some funds returned to wallets likely belonging to investors in payments resembling a Ponzi scheme. An early successful withdrawal therefore would not, by itself, prove that later displayed profits came from real trading.
The Alberta Securities Commission had already warned on 17 February 2026 about this signal-and-deposit setup and high fees or delays when users tried to withdraw. Its notice names dsjex.net, bg877.com, bg661.com, dsj89.com and dsjex123.com. It also distinguishes this scheme from the separate Ontario-based BG Wealth entities. Match the exact offer and domain, not just the words “BG Wealth”.
Why an SEC document was not a licence
The complaint says BG Wealth filed a Form ADV as an exempt reporting adviser and DSJ filed a Form D notice. The filings were then presented as SEC approval, alongside fabricated certificates. The SEC says neither entity was registered with it and the filings contained false information.
The useful distinction is between submitting information and receiving permission. A document visible on an official website does not mean the regulator approved the investment. The SEC’s release says the two filings have since been removed from its website.
Does moving to HQIEX solve a blocked withdrawal?
The complaint describes withdrawal blocks followed by demands for additional “tax” payments and further deposits to move to HQI Exchange, or HQIEX. It says people who paid still could not withdraw.
Treat a migration message as a new payment demand, not proof that your old balance is safe. Keep the original DSJ account details, the new domain, wallet addresses and every message explaining why money is required. Do not combine a new deposit with your old account balance when calculating what you actually paid.
What to do with your payment records
Contact the bank or exchange used to send funds through its official support route. Provide dates, amounts, transaction hashes, networks and destination addresses. Ask it to record the suspected fraud and explain any steps available for those transfers. Report to your local police and financial regulator; US readers can also use FBI IC3.
The SEC is seeking court orders, financial penalties and repayment of alleged unlawful gains. That request is not an announcement that compensation is available. Verify any supposed claims portal through the regulator or court before sending documents or money. Our recovery-service guide explains how to check a new recovery offer.
If you contacted BG Wealth, used DSJEX or received an HQIEX payment demand, request a free phone consultation. We can help you organise the timeline, separate deposits from displayed profits and understand the next steps without promising recovery.
Sources
Where to get help in your country
Choose your country to see where to check a company, report a scam and get help.
Choose your country to see local contacts. If it is not listed, you can ask our team for help.
🇬🇧 The United Kingdom
🔎 Check the firm
FCA Firm Checker — Search the firm name, its website, or the reference number it gave you.
🚨 Report it
Report Fraud (City of London Police) — Report online or call 0300 123 2040. In Scotland, call Police Scotland on 101.
↩ Ask for your money back
Financial Ombudsman Service — Complain to the firm first. If the issue remains unresolved, check whether the Financial Ombudsman Service can handle your case. Its service is free.
Contacts and responsibilities can change. Check the details on the relevant official website.
Was this article helpful?
Thank you. Your feedback helps us improve.
Your reason has been saved.
Your callback request is received.
Our team will call .
You do not need to send another request. The call is free.
Your reference:
Request a free callback
Leave your number. We will talk through what happened.
Name and phone number are required. All other details are optional.
Your saved draft has been restored.
More platform checks
Alphavista Exchange
alphavistaexchange.com
Alphavista Exchange advertised investment plans paying up to 300% per trade alongside instant withdrawals and insurance of up to $1 million. Its claimed authorisations were not matched to Alphavista in the CySEC and Seychelles FSA lists checked on 4 November 2026. These combined warning signs support our suspicion of possible fraud. Do not send money on the strength of these claims. The offer described here comes from indexed copies; the website did not open during the latest check.
Read the evidence →
FXJunction
fxjunction.com
FXJunction links traders to signal providers, but a broker account balance and FXJunction credits are different things. Its FAQ sets a $100 minimum for redeemable credits and excludes bonus credits. On 4 November 2026, the FAQ said providers keep 70%, or 80% for referred copiers, while the provider page promised 90%. Ask which terms apply to your account. This inconsistency and an old complaint justify scrutiny, but do not prove fraud.
Read the evidence →
HOS Broker / AtlasBrokerOption
hosbroker.site ws.hosbroker.site statsglt.hosbroker.site
HOS Broker searches lead to hosbroker.site, a trading page using several different names. Its withdrawal-policy link opens no policy, and its legal-page link returned an error. We consider these serious warning signs of possible fraud and would not deposit while the operator and withdrawal rules remain unclear.
Read the evidence →Been scammed by a company that isn't listed here yet?
Report a scamThink this information about you or your business is inaccurate? Write to [email protected] — see our methodology for how we review and correct reports.