Nova Vestra review: daily returns and the FMA warning
Known domains/brands: novavestra.com app.novavestra.com
The Proofmark · Our methodology
Verified by the Proofmark team · how we verify
Checked by The Proofmark editorial team against our methodology before publishing
How we checked this case: FMA warning, live crypto plans and website terms checked on 29 October 2026. The daily returns are the provider’s advertising claims, not verified earnings.
Nova Vestra presents itself as a broad investment platform: crypto, shares, forex and financing services appear under one brand. Its crypto page makes a much more specific pitch — 5% or 7% a day, with entry amounts running into tens of thousands of dollars.
Those figures change the question from “Does the website look professional?” to “What evidence supports this offer, and who is responsible for my money?” The Austrian financial regulator has now named the provider in a warning.
This review concerns novavestra.com and the account links to app.novavestra.com displayed on that site. The name appears as both Nova Vestra and Novavestra. It should not be confused with unrelated businesses that have similar names.
What the crypto plans actually promise
The live crypto page checked on 29 October 2026 displayed these terms:
| Plan | Advertised daily return | Amount shown | Duration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | 5% | $15,000 minimum; $49,999 maximum | 14–20 days |
| Premium | 7% | $49,999 minimum; $99,999 maximum | 14–20 days |
The Standard description promises instant withdrawals; Premium promises withdrawals that are always available. Neither statement proves that a customer has received money.
Original page capture, 29 October 2026. The English wording is retained as evidence; the table above explains the terms.
At 5%, a $15,000 deposit would supposedly produce $750 in one day. This is simply the arithmetic of the advertisement, not a forecast or a return we have verified. A plan promoting that rate demands evidence far beyond a trading chart or a dashboard balance.
The page also claims partnerships with insured custody providers without identifying those providers in that section. References to Bitcoin, security tools or insurance do not establish who holds a particular client’s assets or what a policy covers.
What the FMA warning says
On 28 October 2026, Austria’s Financial Market Authority warned about Nova Vestra, named novavestra.com, and described an alleged address in Brunn am Gebirge.
The FMA says the provider is not authorised to conduct the banking and securities business requiring permission in Austria. It specifically identifies lending and executing orders for clients. This is a concrete regulatory warning about specified services in Austria, not a court ruling establishing every alleged offence or a statement about every country.
An address in Austria or the United States does not override that warning. Nor does the registration number printed in the website footer establish permission to provide the services being sold.
What is missing from the contractual explanation?
The terms describe Novavestra as a technology platform for researching and trading financial instruments and say its tools are informational or educational. The crypto page, meanwhile, advertises fixed daily percentages attached to specific investment amounts.
That leaves a practical question: what contract creates the right to those advertised payments, and which legal entity owes them? The reviewed terms use the brand name and a general reference to the law of the jurisdiction where it is based, without specifying that jurisdiction in the governing-law clause.
The website lists offices in Seattle, San Francisco and Brunn am Gebirge. A list of addresses does not answer which company accepts a customer’s money, which regulator covers the exact service, or where a dispute can be pursued.
These gaps, the extraordinary daily returns and the FMA warning support our view that the offer is unsafe and that there are strong grounds to suspect fraud. The evidence establishes the warning and the published claims; it does not establish a verified number of victims or total customer losses.
If you are waiting for a Nova Vestra withdrawal
Save the original request and ask for a written response identifying the amount, date, stated reason for delay and contractual basis for any charge. Compare that response with the withdrawal promise you were shown.
A useful request is:
I requested withdrawal of […] on […]. Please confirm the status, the expected payment date and the exact contractual basis for any restriction or fee.
Do not send a further deposit simply because someone calls it a tax, verification payment or account upgrade needed to release your balance. Ask your bank or sending platform to review the situation. A number displayed inside an investment dashboard is not proof that equivalent funds are available for withdrawal.
This is guidance for someone facing a payment problem. It is not a claim that every Nova Vestra customer has been refused a withdrawal.
Steps to take after sending money
- Contact the payment provider promptly. Give the recipient, dates and amounts, and the FMA warning. Ask what recall, fraud-report or dispute route is available for that payment.
- Preserve the evidence. Keep the offer, full website address, messages, receipts, bank-account details and withdrawal history. For crypto, add the transaction hashes, destination addresses and network used.
- Protect access. Change reused passwords. If you gave remote access to a device or banking, tell the bank and secure the device. Never give a caller a wallet seed phrase or one-time banking code.
- Make an official report. Use the route appropriate to your country and payment. Our reporting guide explains where to start.
Completed blockchain transfers generally cannot be reversed by the sending provider. Reporting can still preserve information and allow the provider to consider available measures; it is not a promise of recovery.
Need help making sense of the records?
If you contacted Nova Vestra, sent money or are being asked to pay again before withdrawal, request a free phone consultation. We can help you understand the warning, organise the payment records and work out which questions to put to your bank or platform.
Do not pay a new “recovery agent” just because they say they know this case. Check the identity and terms using our recovery-service guide. No one can guarantee a refund on the basis of a screenshot of your balance.
Sources
Where to get help in your country
Choose your country to see where to check a company, report a scam and get help.
Choose your country to see local contacts. If it is not listed, you can ask our team for help.
🇬🇧 The United Kingdom
🔎 Check the firm
FCA Firm Checker — Search the firm name, its website, or the reference number it gave you.
🚨 Report it
Report Fraud (City of London Police) — Report online or call 0300 123 2040. In Scotland, call Police Scotland on 101.
↩ Ask for your money back
Financial Ombudsman Service — Complain to the firm first. If the issue remains unresolved, check whether the Financial Ombudsman Service can handle your case. Its service is free.
Contacts and responsibilities can change. Check the details on the relevant official website.
Was this article helpful?
Thank you. Your feedback helps us improve.
Your reason has been saved.
Your callback request is received.
Our team will call .
You do not need to send another request. The call is free.
Your reference:
Request a free callback
Leave your number. We will talk through what happened.
Name and phone number are required. All other details are optional.
Your saved draft has been restored.
More platform checks
Alphavista Exchange
alphavistaexchange.com
Alphavista Exchange advertised investment plans paying up to 300% per trade alongside instant withdrawals and insurance of up to $1 million. Its claimed authorisations were not matched to Alphavista in the CySEC and Seychelles FSA lists checked on 4 November 2026. These combined warning signs support our suspicion of possible fraud. Do not send money on the strength of these claims. The offer described here comes from indexed copies; the website did not open during the latest check.
Read the evidence →
FXJunction
fxjunction.com
FXJunction links traders to signal providers, but a broker account balance and FXJunction credits are different things. Its FAQ sets a $100 minimum for redeemable credits and excludes bonus credits. On 4 November 2026, the FAQ said providers keep 70%, or 80% for referred copiers, while the provider page promised 90%. Ask which terms apply to your account. This inconsistency and an old complaint justify scrutiny, but do not prove fraud.
Read the evidence →
HOS Broker / AtlasBrokerOption
hosbroker.site ws.hosbroker.site statsglt.hosbroker.site
HOS Broker searches lead to hosbroker.site, a trading page using several different names. Its withdrawal-policy link opens no policy, and its legal-page link returned an error. We consider these serious warning signs of possible fraud and would not deposit while the operator and withdrawal rules remain unclear.
Read the evidence →Been scammed by a company that isn't listed here yet?
Report a scamThink this information about you or your business is inaccurate? Write to [email protected] — see our methodology for how we review and correct reports.